Category Archive : 5700 xt review reddit
Join the Radeon Vanguard program Beta Testing. Rule 1: Tech Support - Tech Support posts are only allowed in the quarterly tech support megathread - you can find the latest linked in the sidebar or pinned on the front page. Rule 3: Be civil, no religion or politics - Remember the human, be civil and follow sitewide rules; brigading, personal attacks, mass mentioning users and the use of slurs are not allowed. Discussion of politics and religion is also not allowed.
This also includes products that rely on AMD technologies, such as motherboards or next-gen consoles. If a post is made and it is not clear how it relates to AMD, an explanation in the thread will be required upon posting that details how it is relevant. If the post lacks said comment, it will be removed. Content that is primarily about a competitor or industry that merely references AMD or AMD products would not meet this criteria.
Any rumour or claim that is just a statement from an unknown source containing no supporting evidence will be removed.
AORUS Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G Review
Rule 7: No shitposts or memes - Shitposts and memes are not allowed as link or text posts, however, they are allowed when commenting on a thread. Rule 8 : Straw polls and Reddit polls are not allowed - We encourage discussion and debate.
Rule 9 : No editorialization - Editorialized titles are not allowed, please use the suggested title for link submissions or copy the title of the original link.
Posts that are editorialized will be removed. We also reserve the right to remove posts or comments that may not technically break the rules in situations where moderators feel the post is not appropriate.
If you have a question regarding the way a rule was or was not applied to a particular post or comment, please message us via modmail. If you believe your post should be an exception to the rules, please message the moderators before posting it. Until this point. I just went to benchmark websites and kinda crowd sourced opinions and ended up not knowing what any of it meant and just randomly bought the GPU that I guessed was good off newegg. I made the mistake of buying the reference rx Lesson learned even though the card has been a goddamned trooper.
So this looks like a bunch of pretty solid stat lines. From what I can tell from my uneducated POV is this is pretty great performance over the blower. But everyone already knew that would happen. So anyway getting to my point. People in the know should I wait another month to look at the nitro and all the other AIB cards? Will they really be that much dramatically cooler? Or realistically just get this? I feel pretty comfortable looking at those numbers linked above that even if there are better cards that end up coming out that I wont be unhappy with this card.
But is there any real chance that another XT from another manufacturer or the nitro are going to be that much cooler? I dont over clock anything. It runs at the settings out of the box. I might raise fan speeds but thats it. So if the reason for getting another card is it will over clock better I guess I should have said thats a non consideration for me. No, the Pulse has a good heatsink and the fans are massive. It performs better both temp and noise wise than the triple-fan XT Strix in Techpowerup's reviews.
My computer has no RBG, is in a fully solid case and sits on the other side of a wall in a closet with nothing in it but an air filter and tons and tons of breathing room.AORUS has deployed one of the best custom coolers on the RX XT 8G graphics card that I've used so far, with some impressive cooling performance that you'll read about later on in the review.
Speaking of style, it's not just style -- it's also the glorious GIGABYTE's words, and also mine black metal back plate that protects the back of the card.
PCIe 4. Not just that, but the RGB Fusion 2. It's a thick card -- but it is also super-quiet, and one of the coolest-operating custom Radeon RX XT graphics cards that I've tested so far.
Once again from the top, with the PCIe power connectors visible here, and that massively chunky heat sink. I've got this installed into my GPU test bed as the new Games Storage drive, since games are so damn big now. You can search results for your GPU, to see if it falls in line with other systems based on similar hardware. Heaven is an intensive GPU benchmark that really pushes your silicon to its limits.
Middle-earth: Shadow of War is a sequel to the popular Shadow of Mordor, which was powered by the Lithtech engine. You can buy Middle-earth: Shadow of War at Amazon. Metro Exodus is one of the hardest tests that our graphics cards have to go through, with 4A Games' latest creation being one of the best looking games on the market.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider is one of the latest games to join our graphics card benchmark lineup, with the game built using the Foundation engine as a base, the same engine in Rise of the Tomb Raider. Nothing to complain about there at all for p performance. Nothing unusual here. I don't think there's anything I need to criticize here This keeps the card pretty silent, or cooler and beefier performance. It keeps up with the other custom cards, and even beats them in most cases especially with great thermal performance.
It even comes with an over-the-top ability to handle not 3, not 4, but 6 monitors at once. Anthony is a long time PC enthusiast with a passion of hate for games built around consoles.
FPS gaming since the pre-Quake days, where you were insulted if you used a mouse to aim, he has been addicted to gaming and hardware ever since. Working in IT retail for 10 years gave him great experience with custom-built PCs. His addiction to GPU tech is unwavering. Video Cards. We may earn an affiliate commission.
Read about TweakTown's awards! Anthony Garreffa Anthony is a long time PC enthusiast with a passion of hate for games built around consoles. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here. Please contact us if you wish to respond. Newsletter Subscription.New xfx rx xt triple dissipation graphics card?
I literally can't find anything on the internet acknowledging that this thing exists other than on XFX's own website. I have no idea how good it is but I decided to get it since I wanted to upgrade anyway. Please let me know if you have heard about this card and how decent its thermals and noise levels are.
Mabey one reason is it came out on Amazon one week ago but I shirley should have seen at least one review if this came out on their website in March!! The clocks are different. I saw that and reasoned and quite rightly that if two fans make an overclocked card too hot, then three fans will make a stock-clocked card run nice and cool. Sure enough, they do.
Same here! Hope it ends up being a good card. Hard to find a better price for a good xt at the moment. I hope you've had the time to use the card a bit; what's it like, how are its thermals?
I would not recommend this card. It was noisy and hot. I got a red dragon instead and it's great for the same price and small card overall. I don't think that you're lyng, I think that maybe you just got a bad one. That doesn't mean that I thought PowerColor makes crap, I just got bad ones. There were no more available so I got two Gigabyte HD s instead.
Personally, I would never get a two-fan hgh-end card over a three-fan because triple-fan coolers are just naturally quieter because there's three fans that don't have to spin as fast as two.
I got this card 3 days ago and so far no problems. Thank you so much for reporting. Whats your case and psu? Did you change anything in the bios? Like pcie 4. Newest drivers or old one? Stock fan curve? Its been a week, have you encountered any problems now? You may have not heard of that brand before, but after a week and a half I've had no problems.Whereas Vega 64 featured 64 compute units and Vega 56, 56 compute units, the RX gets only 36 and the XT gets However, this is somewhat of a meaningless comparison as the cores used in the Navi GPUs are very different to Vega's.
That's what a competitive GPU landscape looks like. As for clock speeds, these can be a little misleading though at least AMD has specified a gaming clock. So the gaming clock is a more accurate metric and we generally saw clock speeds around 50 MHz higher than what AMD claims, at least in our 21 degree test environment, though in more adverse scenarios the fan speed should simply ramp up to maintain clock speeds.
Navi also brings support for PCIe 4. The latest drivers available at the time of testing have been used and all this data is fresh for this review and collected in the past two weeks. We have tested 12 games before our usual performance breakdowns and cost per frame data. First up we have Battlefield V and right away we have some odd results. Gameplay was smooth and no stuttering was noticed but we'll have to see if this is something AMD can solve with a future driver or not.
Now with Metro Exodus though. Moving on to Resident Evil 2, we see fairly competitive results. Although Nvidia enjoys a performance advantage, particularly after their Super boost, their graphics cards also cost more, so it will be interesting to see how they all compare in the cost per frame analysis at the end of this review. Next up we have Shadow of the Tomb Raider and here the and Super are neck and neck.
The XT only managed to match the Super, which isn't a great result overall. The matches the Super and the same is true when comparing the XT and Super. The standard easily beats the Super, leaving the Super behind in a completely different performance tier. Given they both cost a little less this is a solid result.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT review
The last game in today's roundup is Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. Not a great result but not too disappointing to end on either. Our first graph looks at GPU power exclusively, so not the board power. Now when looking at total system consumption, we see a few changes. The is seen matching the standard whereas previously it consumed noticeably less power. The blower fan typically spun at RPM in our testing.
As for the memory, we were only able to get the GDDR6 up to a transfer speed of As for the standardout of the box it ran at 75 degrees with a fan speed of RPM and maintained a typical operating frequency of MHz. Then when overclocked with the auto fan speed it hit 85 degrees, but the fan was only spinning at RPM. We can assume this is a bug with the early revision drivers.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and RX 5700 Review
It got loud but nothing crazy or unbearable. This allowed the to average a core frequency of MHz at 70 degrees. So it will be interesting to see how these two stack up when it comes to the cost per frame comparison. Speaking of value, the XT, like the Super, not only eliminates the standard but it also waves goodbye to the compute-heavy Radeon VII.
First we have an MSRP comparison using launch prices. Maybe AMD could have done with the original prices announced a few weeks ago, but evidently they wanted to go for a good value and try to disrupt the otherwise GeForce-dominated market.
So that's actually really good.Even in a more competitive graphics card scene than we've ever witnessed, it stands out. AMD hopes to boost rasterization performance in games by tailoring its graphics architecture specifically around gaming — rather than the compute-focused performance of the AMD Radeon VII. This architecture should be able to provide up to 1. This boost to performance-per-clock is joined by the benefits to power efficiency brought by the move to 7nm. This is an open-source library of image-improving technologies, and should theoretically work on most GPUs — if not now, then in the future.
But, obviously these effects will work best on AMD processors. The AMD Radeon RX also has a feature for the esports players out there, who are less focused on image quality, and are more focused on raw performance.
This mode will essentially tell your processor to wait until the GPU is ready before sending new frames to it. CPU: 3. No matter how many cool software features come to AMD Navi, the most important thing, especially in a post-Nvidia Turing landscape is raw performance.
It provides excellent p gaming performance, and plenty of features that will actually be usable from day one.Worst \u0026 Best AMD RX 5700 XT Video Card Round-Up: Thermals, Pricing, \u0026 Features
If AMD is able to drop prices on this card by about 50 bucks or quid, this graphics card will be a no-brainer. Please deactivate your ad blocker in order to see our subscription offer. Home Reviews Components. For Excellent p gaming performance Plenty of forward-looking features Affordable. Against No ray tracing Blower-style cooler. Image 1 of 6 Image credit: Future. Image 2 of 6 Image credit: Future. Image 3 of 6 Image credit: Future. Image 4 of 6 Image credit: Future.
Image 5 of 6 Image credit: Future. Image 6 of 6 Image credit: Future. Image 1 of 7 Image credit: Infogram. Image 2 of 7 Image credit: Infogram. Image 3 of 7 Image credit: Infogram.Please keep in mind that we are here to help you build a computer, not to build it for you. Wasn't expecting the perf or price? Actual gap ended up being a wee bit smaller but it's still just ahead of that card. The price was a real surprise though, but necessary.
Definitely moving on from my Vega 64 to the xt as soon as custom coolers are out. Depending on their oc potential, I might screw it snd buy me the founder edition and put it undewater.
Wait, so if I'm getting this right, at the moment xt has the potential to outdo super? From the benchmarks I've seen, it really depends on the game. In Forza for example the amd cards are way ahead. From what I've seen it's just that game and BFV. Nvidia probably new this, which is why the Supers were released.
Am at work and can't watch videos. However in the Tomshardware benchmark, the xt beats the super by 25 fps on average p haven't looked at other resolutions since that's my screens resolution but loses by the same amount in other games.
Overall DX12 seems to benefit the amd cards a lot. I don't doubt a slight advantage in most known popular games, but saying the super beats the xt by far is just not true. Especially with AIB coolers The soft table edits combined with undervolting I wasn't going to upgrade my system as I can still play most things just fine Curious what you decided. I'm wrestling with the same decision right now.
And the thing is, why would you buy the reference cards? Third party cards won't have those blower issues. I wouldn't buy an Nvidia reference card, either, I'd wait for both brands.
At an extremely loud 53dBA on their bench, the XT maintains a consistent core clock in thealbeit with junction temps in the mid 90s.
Noise normalized to more bearable 40dBA the card was thermal throttling. This is using 3DMark. If you want highest end stuff sure, but myself and majority of gamers are fine with p 60Hz or Hz, or p 60fps which amd provides for much less money. Yeah AMD is still behind, but it seems like nvidia doesnt seem to be able to pull ahead too much.
Yes you can, but you need to buy an aftermarket cooler from companies such as Arctic or Raijintek for that and install it yourself. Blowers are always noisy as fuck. I'm pretty disappointed they went triple fan for Vega 2, and the gets blowers.Though AMD doesn't take a decisive victory in terms of performance, it certainly does in terms of value.
It more than holds its own against both of Nvidia's competitors, with only thermals and noise being the big drawbacks. There's not any ray tracing to be had here, but I don't think that will be a factor for another year at least.
On that front the Nvidia cards are certainly more future proof. Runs hot but delivers stellar value. The day we've all been waiting for has finally arrived. A second-generation or third? The fallout from that was a last minute price drop for the Radeon cards, though the Radeon GM tweeted it was all a big setup on their part, as they inflated the prices initially and Nvidia took the bait.
We'll never know if that really was the plan all along, but either way the GPU wars are officially back on in a very big way.
I also covered most of this from the big reveal at E3but I'll do it again for those who weren't following along. Nvidia's GPUs are currently built on a 12nm process, so by going with a smaller node AMD can put more transistors in the same space with better efficiency.
More Expert Tech Roundups. Verdict Though AMD doesn't take a decisive victory in terms of performance, it certainly does in terms of value. Was this article informative? YES NO. More Reviews by josh norem. IGN Logo Recommends.